Environment and Urbanization

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 7, No. 1, 173-204 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/095624789500700106
© 1995 International Institute for Environment and Development

Poverty and livelihoods: whose reality counts?

Robert Chambers

The Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RE, UK, Fax: (44) 1273 621202

This paper explores how professionals’ universal, reductionist and standardized views of poverty differ from those of the poor themselves. Poverty line thinking concerned with income-poverty and employment thinking concerned with jobs, project Northern concerns on the South, where the realities of the poor are local, diverse, often complex and dynamic. Examples illustrate how poor people’s criteria differ from those assumed for them by professionals. The paper also discusses neglected dimensions of deprivation including vulnerability, seasonality, powerlessness and humiliation. In the new understandings of poverty, wealth as an objective is replaced by wellbeing and "employment" in jobs by livelihood. The final sections argue for altruism and reversals to enable poor people to analyze and articulate their own needs, and they conclude with the implications for policy and practice of putting first the priorities of the poor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Progress in Development StudiesHome page
C. McIlwaine and C. Moser
Poverty, violence and livelihood security in urban Colombia and Guatemala
Progress in Development Studies, April 1, 2003; 3(2): 113 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Development StudiesHome page
S. Bradshaw and B. Linneker
Civil society responses to poverty reduction strategies in Nicaragua
Progress in Development Studies, April 1, 2003; 3(2): 147 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Progress in Development StudiesHome page
R. Few
Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: local responses to a global threat
Progress in Development Studies, January 1, 2003; 3(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Pugh
Poverty and Progress? Reflections on Housing and Urban Policies in Developing Countries, 1976-96
Urban Stud, October 1, 1997; 34(10): 1547 - 1595.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Mcllwaine
Third-world development: urbanizing for the future
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 1997; 21(3): 406 - 413.
[PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
D. Drakakis-Smith
Third World Cities: Sustainable Urban Development II Population, Labour and Poverty
Urban Stud, May 1, 1996; 33(4-5): 673 - 701.
[PDF]