Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The environmental impacts and public costs of unguided informal settlement; the case of Montego Bay

Bruce Ferguson

Inter-American Development Bank, E-0803, 1300 New York Ave. NW, Washington DC 20577, USA. Fax: (1) 202 623 3173; BruceF{at}iadb.org

The development of squatter and other informal settlements in Montego Bay (Jamaica) helps individual low-income households (although not the poorest) solve their shelter problem. However, informal settlement also exacts tremendous costs to neighbourhoods and the city as a whole, largely in the form of environmental problems that threaten household health and the region’s main economic base, the tourist trade. These environmental costs come in the form of inadequate or no provision for paved roads, piped water, sanitation, and garbage for a high proportion of those living in informal settlements. When these costs are taken into account, informal settlement is no less expensive than formal-sector development. The paper quantifies the costs of providing infrastructure to unguided informal settlement (squatter upgrading) and shows them as comparable to those for government-produced serviced sites and privately produced moderate-income projects - and the infrastructure is often of poorer quality and with less possibility for cost recovery. The paper ends with a discussion of policies that can help solve this problem. Instead of reacting to land invasions, governments should get ahead of low-income housing demand by guiding the development of informal settlements and by lowering the cost of formalsector production. This strategy promises higher quality housing and infrastructure, lower costs and fewer environmental problems.

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 8, No. 2, 171-194 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/095624789600800218


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?