Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitlin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

With and beyond the state — co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations

Diana Mitlin

ED, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H 0DD, UK, Diana.Mitlin{at}iied.org

This paper reviews the use of co-production — with state and citizens working together — as a grassroots strategy to secure political influence and access resources and services. To date, the literature on social movements has concentrated on more explicitly political strategies used by such movements to contest for power and influence. Co-production, when considered, is viewed as a strategy used by citizens and the state to extend access to basic services with relatively little consideration given to its wider political ramifications. However, co-production is used increasingly by grassroots organizations and federations as part of an explicit political strategy. This paper examines the use of co-productive strategies by citizen groups and social movement organizations to enable individual members and their associations to secure effective relations with state institutions that address both immediate basic needs and enable them to negotiate for greater benefits.

Key Words: citizen—state relations • co-production • social movement strategies

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 20, No. 2, 339-360 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0956247808096117


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
D. Satterthwaite
Editorial: What role for mayors in good city governance?
Environment and Urbanization, April 1, 2009; 21(1): 3 - 17.
[PDF]


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
J. Ayers
International funding to support urban adaptation to climate change
Environment and Urbanization, April 1, 2009; 21(1): 225 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]