Environment and Urbanization

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Usavagovitwong, N.
Right arrow Articles by Posriprasert, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 18, No. 2, 523-536 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0956247806069629
© 2006 International Institute for Environment and Development

Urban poor housing development on Bangkok’s waterfront: securing tenure, supporting community processes

Nattawut Usavagovitwong

AEP-Institute for Empirical Research in Planning Issues, FB-06: Architecture, Urban Planning and Landscape, University of Kassel, Germany, nattawutu{at}yahoo.co.uk

Prayong Posriprasert

Faculty of Architecture, Sripatum University, Bangkok, Thailand, prayong{at}spu.ac.th

This paper describes a project to upgrade living conditions and provide secure tenure in nine "canal settlement" communities in Bangkok. It explains how this was planned and implemented, both on the ground and at the policy level, working with national institutions including the Community Organizations Development Institute (CODI) and the government body that owned the land. The different institutions involved are described, including the savings groups in each of the nine communities and the network of community organizations, which were particularly important for the realization of the project. The paper also discusses how upgrading plans were developed and how conflicts were addressed.

Key Words: community network • secure tenure • stakeholder participation • upgrading


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?