Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hasan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The political and institutional blockages to good governance: the case of the Lyari expressway in Karachi

Arif Hasan

Urban Resource Centre, and the Orangi Pilot Project-Research and Training Institute, ahasan{at}digicom.net.pa

This paper describes the attempts by government agencies to build an expressway along the Lyari River in Karachi, and the struggles by the long-established communities, whose homes and livelihoods would be destroyed, for consultation and consideration of less damaging alternatives. Official proposals would destroy the livelihoods of 40,000 wage earners and the schools of 26,000 students, along with household and community investments worth some US$ 80 million. Government planners and politicians failed to follow official procedures to allow public discussions of the plans or to provide communities with details of how and when they might be affected. The paper also describes how political parties failed to respond to the concerns of the inhabitants who were their supporters, even as they recognized that these concerns were legitimate. With no consultative process that can resolve differences and make planning more pro-poor and pro-environment, powerful interests have been able to impose their decisions despite well-planned alternatives to official proposals, which are more effective, less costly and far less disruptive to Karachi’s economy. However, these alternatives are being discussed more widely, as community organizations formed by those affected by the plans work with local academics, researchers and NGOs - and as the middle class and the media begin to see the legitimacy of their concerns and the value of the alternatives they propose.

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 17, No. 2, 127-141 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/095624780501700210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
D. Satterthwaite
Editorial: What role for mayors in good city governance?
Environment and Urbanization, April 1, 2009; 21(1): 3 - 17.
[PDF]