Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Costa Rica’s Triangle of Solidarity: can government-led spaces for negotiation enhance the involvement of civil society in governance?

Harry Smith

Centre for Environment and Human Settlements, School of the Built Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh EH14 4ASH.C.Smith{at}sbe.hw.ac.uk

Initiatives in participatory governance can rise from the grassroots or be implemented by government, examples of the latter being particularly notable in Latin America. This paper considers the scope and limitations of spaces of negotiation opened up from above, examining one particular initiative undertaken in Costa Rica between 1998 and 2002, the Triangle of Solidarity, which involved the state (central and local) and civil society, and the relationships between them. Taking an institutionalist approach, a detailed study of two urban neighbourhoods is used to assess the extent to which this initiative offered a new opportunity for political inclusion and enabled a redistribution of resources. In practice, there appears to have been little substantive change in the roles and position of central and local government, and civil society. This raises questions about the processes that are likely to lead to participatory governance, and emphasizes the importance of the weaker groups in negotiating and fighting for a transfer of power, and thus in shaping the spaces for negotiation central to urban management.

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 16, No. 1, 63-78 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/095624780401600106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Post and S. Mwangi
Constraints on Neighbourhood Activism: Experiences with Services Upgrading in Nakuru, Kenya
Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 665 - 686.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
T. Kjellstrom and S. Mercado
Towards action on social determinants for health equity in urban settings
Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2008; 20(2): 551 - 574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Latin American PerspectivesHome page
M. Hume
The Myths of Violence: Gender, Conflict, and Community in El Salvador
Latin American Perspectives, September 1, 2008; 35(5): 59 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]