Environment and Urbanization

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baumann, T.
Right arrow Articles by Bolnick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 13, No. 2, 103-115 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/095624780101300208

Out of the frying pan into the fire: the limits of loan finance in a capital subsidy context

Ted Baumann

Cape Town, tedb{at}iafrica.com

Joel Bolnick

Urban Research Centre, joelb{at}dialogue.org.za

This paper describes the difficulties that the South African Homeless People’s Federation has had to face, as the government housing subsidies to which its members are entitled have not been forthcoming. The Federation’s members are entitled to a housing subsidy of around US$ 1,500 - and there are housing developments all over South Africa built by Federation savings and loan groups that have demonstrated their capacity to build good quality homes with this. Because of the time taken to obtain housing subsidies, a special fund (the uTshani Fund) was set up to provide bridging loans so that members could start building their own homes. The Fund was to be sustained, as members obtained housing subsidies and repaid the loan thus making more funds available for other bridging loans. But most members who took out loans never received the subsidy and many now face difficulties in repaying these loans. This paper describes how the problem arose and how the Federation and its support NGO, People’s Dialogue on Land and Shelter, are seeking to address it. In doing so, it discusses the difficulties that movements of the urban poor face in reconciling the immediate needs of members (including access to housing) with strategies to obtain the long-term political changes that would allow such needs to be met sustainably.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
F. Miraftab
Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2004; 24(1): 89 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]