Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Waste management in Madras revisited

P. B. Anand

Development and Project Planning Centre, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK p.b.anand{at}bradford.ac.uk

This paper examines how households in Madras (official name – Chennai) view garbage problems, what their preferences are for improved services and the extent to which they would pay for them. It includes a comparison between areas served and not served by Civic Exnora units where neighbourhoods organize their own primary collection; such units now provide services for close to half a million people. The findings are drawn from focus group discussions, household interviews from across a range of income levels and spatial locations (within Madras City, within the nine towns around the city and other settlements within the metropolitan area) and in-depth interviews with those who manage the Civic Exnora units. The findings highlight how people are willing to cooperate and pay substantial sums for waste collection – but not for other waste management costs (such as transport and final disposal). They also show how the financial viability of neighbourhood collection schemes such as the Civic Exnora units depends on having transfer stations close by, to which the collected wastes can be taken.

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 11, No. 2, 161-176 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/095624789901100214


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
D. Satterthwaite
Editorial: The social and political basis for citizen action on urban poverty reduction
Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2008; 20(2): 307 - 318.
[PDF]


Home page
Environment and UrbanizationHome page
K. Parizeau, V. Maclaren, and L. Chanthy
Budget sheets and buy-in: financing community-based waste management in Siem Reap, Cambodia
Environment and Urbanization, October 1, 2008; 20(2): 445 - 463.
[Abstract] [PDF]