Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Environment and Urbanization
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernández, O.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Voluntary recycling in Quito: factors associated with participation in a pilot programme

Orlando Hernández

GreenCOM, 1825 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington DC 20009, USA greencom{at}aed.org

Barbara Rawlins

Reva Schwartz

GreenCOM, 1825 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington DC 20009, USA greencom{at}aed.org

This paper describes a pilot recycling programme in Quito and the factors associated with residents’ participation in separating their wastes. This municipal programme extended garbage collection to previously unserved neighbourhoods through micro-enterprises formed by residents which provided separate collection services (on different days) for organic (compostable), recyclable and non-recyclable wastes, and delivered these to municipal depots. The revenues from the sale of recyclables went to funds to support neighbourhood improvements. A combination of focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and a household survey identified the steps that would have to be taken to increase and sustain residents’ separation of wastes – for instance, a more reliable collection service, more evidence that the funds generated were being used for neighbourhood improvement and a better information system about the programme. The research also highlighted two other issues. The first was the need for better integration between recycling programmes and existing informal waste collection systems. The second was the importance of involving programme beneficiaries in the design of local development interventions, such as the recycling programme analyzed here, for them to be sustainable.

Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 11, No. 2, 145-160 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/095624789901100213


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?